DELL INC. FRAUD Business practices came under fire when America's seventh largest firm Enron collapsed due to unethical accounting strategies. This case triggered a series of unwelcome events where one after the other, large organizations in the U.S. collapsed or run for bankruptcy cover with one case even implicated the infamous Martha Stewart for insider trading. The various deceitful activities of some larger companies resulted in widespread public mistrust of business practices and values. Companies as big as Adelphia, ENRON, Global Crossing, Kmart, Qwest communications, WorldCom and Xerox are all under thorough investigation by one of the few reliable authorities, Securities and Exchange Commission (Royal Bank of Scotland). All the aforementioned names were business of international repute that were charged with the unethical act of projecting inflated profits to trick stakeholders and earn higher profits and generate greater revenue from expensive stocks (Royal Bank of Scotland). WorldCom ran for insolvency in July 2002, making it one of the biggest bankruptcies of all times (Royal Bank of Scotland). Both World Com and ENRON hugely overstated their profits and hence committed the major crime of misleading stockholders.

Latest in this group has been Dell Inc. otherwise one of the most non-controversial large corporations. Accounting fraud refers to fraud made when declaring revenues made during one business year. This can multiply over time or may simply be a one-time incident but it is now happening more often than we ever knew before. Dell in 2010 failed to inform the SEC of exclusivity payments it received from the chip giant Intel in exchange of the agreement not to use chips made by rival AMD. The reason not many people would ever learn about Dell incident is because Dell kept it all very quiet and quickly resolved the issue by agreeing to pay $100 million as settlement fee for payments not disclosed. It neither agreed nor disagreed to the charges but simply agreed to pay a hefty amount to hush the entire matter.

This was not the first time though that Dell faced problems. An audit in 2003 also confirmed accounting irregularities which had been adjusted by 2007 but it was now in 2010 that government auditor found major irregularity...

(Goldman, 2010)
The financial information presented to the users of account must adhere to certain standards and guidelines and should be a free of biasness or any inconsistency. The guidelines are stated in General Accepted Accounting Principles and every entity must adhere to them when issuing financial statements.

These include the principle of regularity or consistency, principle of non-compensation, principle of prudence, principle of continuity, principle of periodicity, representation in good faith and comparability over time and with other entities. The standard also requires the auditor to consider the effectiveness of the company's audit committee in evaluating the effectiveness of the company's internal control. As part of their internal control responsibilities, a company's principal executive and financial officers are responsible for designing (or overseeing the design of) the process for providing reasonable assurance of the reliability of the company's financial reporting and that the company's financial statements for external purposes are prepared in accordance with GAAP. A management must adopt procedures suited to the needs of a company to evaluate the design of internal control over financial reporting and test its effectiveness. A management must decide on a framework to evaluate the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. SEC rules require that the framework be "a suitable, recognized control framework" that has been "established by a body or group that has followed due-process procedures, including the broad distribution of the framework for public comment." Although other frameworks may comply with SEC criteria, the SEC has specifically stated that the framework in the 1992 report of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission satisfies the criteria. Dell failed to meet the GAAP standards on some occasions and in 2010, it had to face serious charges which were quickly settled for $100 million.

Now that we know the background it is important to understand why it happened and why it has been happening every so often with large…